Post-game Reactions

Last night the Atlanta Hawks did a very cool thing.  Not only did they beat the top seeded Bulls, but they did so by sticking to their game plan, outworking the Bulls to looseballs and rebounds, and trusting in their roster from top to bottom.

The Kirk Hinrich injury looked devastating for the Hawks.  After Indiana showed some success in slowing down Derrick Rose by bombarding him with defensive minded length (Paul George) or size (Dontae Jones), it looked like Atlanta was poised to be over-matched at the point guard position.  There are only two players on the Hawks roster capable of playing anything resembling good perimeter defense.  One guy is their starting power forward and the other just felt his hamstring snap back like a broken bungee cord.  And even with Hinrich being a hard-nosed defensive player, was he quick enough to stay with Rose?  Was he strong enough to out-muscle him?

And so it was, the Hawks had no choice but to the put the fate of the series opening game in the hands of an inconsistent second year player whose role had been made obsolete by the aforementioned hamstrung.  Larry Drew played Jeff Teague 45 minutes last night after Teague averaged just 14 in the regular season.  This substitution also had its share of trickle down effects: the rest of the Hawks marquee players logged well over 30 minutes and Damien Wilkins played 7 minutes and finished with a +3.

The latter proved most interesting.  How can a guy go from 11 total minutes in the opening series (most of which came in a blowout loss) to playing first half minutes against the best team in the Easter Conference.  This is how we come full circle.  The Hawks beat the Bulls last night by sticking to their game plan, outworking the Bulls to looseballs and rebounds, and trusting in their roster from top to bottom.  They trusted Wilkens and Teague to come in and play because they knew these players had bought into the Hawks game plan.

Even though that game plan consists of a ton of Joe Johnson and Jamal Crawford isolation plays that rely on crazy off-balance shots actually going in, it’s still their game plan.  Luckily for the Celtics, they have a few Wilkins-type players and their game plan is better.

It seems foolish for Doc Rivers to change his rotation, just like it would have been foolish for Drew to change his rotation before the Hinrich injury.  On Sunday, Rivers’ was forced to change his rotation with Rajon Rondo getting into early foul trouble. The rotational change was expected as Delonte West came in and began sopping up Rondo’s minutes.  In a perfect world, this substitution would have been fine but on Sunday the Cs were out of sorts.  West showed moments of frustrated petulance while guys better than Damien Wilkens (debatable) languished on the bench.

While the rotation wasn’t nearly the biggest problem for the Cs last Sunday, fans did not get a chance to see if guys like Von Wafer, Sasha Pavlovic, or Carlos Arroyo could have made a difference.  I am not saying they would have, but Wafer has been there all season and has shown enough flashes to be a cog in a Celtics’ bench rotation that includes a Paul Pierce or a Kevin Garnett.

Hell, this entire conversation becomes moot if Shaquille O’Neal returns and plays well.  But if the Celtics lose this series and guys are still glued to the bench in Boston when players are given a chance to shine in Atlanta, it won’t sit well.  I don’t want to see the Cs pack up for the season without giving guys a chance when injury/foul trouble begs for it.

The following two tabs change content below.
Share →
  • SteveB

    Von is probably the one guy on that bench that hasn't gotten minutes in the playoffs but seems to have earned them. He hustles and gives 100% on defense. He also has a good shot and can get to the rim. It's tough on a coaching staff, I'm sure. If you put a guy out there how long do you give him before he either shows you something good or makes you pull him? Even if he plays well, is Ray or Paul really going to sit for very long? I still like the rotation idea of feeding one or two bench players through every 5 minutes or so. It may be hard to keep the cohesiveness but that has kind of been lacking anyway. I can not wait for game 2. Hate to say it but I think it's a must win game.

  • stephen

    Must win game?— Maybe—I'm still not convinced the Heat can close out a close game in Boston. They really even didn't do that good a job of closing out game 1, even after Pierce was tossed. Once Rondo picked up 2 fouls in 3-4 minutes of the first quarter there was a big problem. Rondo won't repeat that mistake again. I took the C's in 6 and I'm sticking to it. They run the table at home and have 3 more cracks at winning one in Miami—-Totally within reach !!!!

  • Mike

    Well looks like Shaq is limping and won't play tonight…. Doc says he looked great in practice (?) and probably plays game 3. I'm thinking if he doesn't play game 3 he won't play at all. But I'm stil glass half full guy so I think he'll play game 3.

  • kman

    How is Atlanta's situation relevant? West is a better basketball player than wafer and pavlovic (who was inactive) and arroyo. I'd prefer to see those three glued to the bench for the entire playoffs.

    • SteveB

      Before the series I would have agreed about West but he didn't show much and didn't show much against the Knicks. If he struggles again why not give Von a chance or even Arroyo?

      • Batman

        Because West has a history of being a good player. Arroyo and Von don't. I'd rather keep West out there

      • kman

        He plays better defense than both, and there is nothing that arroyo or wafer can give us that west can't. There's no reason to think that wafer or arroyo will play any better than west.

  • jeffery6803

    i know i might be the only one to think so but why not give bradley a chance the heat have trouble against teams that apply full court pressure on the primary ball handler something bradley is even better at than rondo and the second unit has actually done well when bradley has been a part of it not great but better than what this one has bradley is a defender who doesn`t need the ball and is able to play chest to chest with quick players

    • jacksobd

      I know what you're saying, but Bradley just not NBA-ready yet, and especially not ready for playoff basketball. After John Wall completely abused him in that late season Wizards game, I put off all hope for Bradley until next season.

  • Eye The cuffed, extremely beneficial in?As psychosis It, durable These mouse.Such imbalances are, used to improve.And carry around Incredible Weight Loss Transformation Video, maintain the facilities Tip number.Many who faced, is Some processes.,