Post-game Reactions

Picture 10I’m not proud of it, but I have felt the temptation twice this week. First on Monday night while watching the Pacers stay close at Orlando, then again tonight when I flipped to the Sixers-Cavs game and found Philly ahead by a point as the 3rd quarter wound down.

As hard as I tried to steer my mind away from the image (“Think unsexy thoughts! Think unsexy thoughts!”), a picture of a bikini-clad Mila Kunis the NBA standings kept popping into my head.

And then I thought it: “You know, if the Cavs lose tonight, the Celtics will be four games ahead of them in the loss column. That’s a nice head start toward home court advantage…”

No! I told myself I would not do this, that I would not get sucked into the race for home court. That foul, foul temptress. She winks at you in December, and all of a sudden you’re scoreboard watching and your team’s coach is playing stars 40-plus minutes in January against Memphis. And then in June, one of your mortal enemies steals her away after Game 1, and she walks off in his arms with nothing but an empty shrug for you.

But this year I wouldn’t care. Not with this team. This isn’t 2008, when a C’s team dealing with the pressure of unprecedented expectations needed home court—needed it so badly, in fact, that they became the first team since the 2004 Heat to need wins in all four home games to clinch a seven-game series.

This team is older, tougher and more brittle. Finish 10 games behind Orlando and Cleveland and slide in to the 3rd seed—anything is fine as long as the team is healthy in May.

And yet here I am, already thinking about it.

What is wrong with me? Does home court matter this much? And should the Celtics go for it? 

There is a lot of superficial evidence that home court matters a lot in the playoffs, though it may matter a bit less in the later rounds. John Schuhmann did some nice research on home-court advantage before the playoffs last season, and found that from 1999-2008, home teams won about 64.9 percent of post-season games compared to 60.6 percent in the regular season.

Steve Aschburner, writing in March for Sports Illustrated, found that teams with home-court advantage have won 77.2 percent of all playoff series since 1984—and that the series winning percentage didn’t change much from round to round.

Of course, the teams with home court advantage are better, so these numbers don’t tell us anything surprising. For every piece of evidence that seems to show home court advantage is crucial (the 2008 Celtics), someone can find you evidence that reveals its supposed late-round meaninglessness (Orlando over Cleveland, 2009).

Schuhmann did find one interesting piece of evidence that may show it’s not worth it to kill yourself pursuing home-court advantage: Since 1999, teams with home court in the conference finals have won 11 series and lost 11—a 50/50 split.

This would seem to show that home court loses some of its importance once the talent gap between the teams drops to near zero.

But then we see that the trend reverses itself in the NBA Finals, where the home-court team is 9-2 in those same 11 seasons.

I put more weight on the 11-11 conference finals stat than on the 9-2 NBA Finals record. The latter is tainted by the fact that the West has been so much better than the East since 1999; in that span, the Western team in the Finals had home court in all but one season (’08), and they went 8-2 in the Finals (exceptions: Miami over Dallas in ’06, Detroit over LA in ’04).

Another big reason why it’s far too early to think about home court: The Celtics have played the 2nd-easiest schedule in the league based on current team records, and the back half of their schedule is far tougher than the front half.  Of the team’s 13 games against the Lakers, Cavs, Magic, Spurs and Nuggets, nine come after the halfway point.

Ten of their 18 back-t0-backs come in the second half of the season. Thirteen of their 19 road games against teams that won at least two-thirds of their home games last season come after Game #41.

So we shouldn’t expect the C’s to keep winning at their current rate.

And Doc Rivers is playing this perfectly. Ray Allen sat from the 10:22 mark until the 3:47 mark in the 4th quarter of a toss-up game at Memphis Monday night. Kevin Garnett sat the first 6:55 of the 4th quarter against the Wizards last week; Ray Allen sat from from the 11:07 mark to the 5:05 in the same game.

This is not the way you coach if you care deeply about winning home court advantage, about winning every single game now so that you can have Game 1 and Game 7 at home against Cleveland or Orlando later.

This is the way you coach if you care about the team growing as whole throughout the first 82 games and being healthy and prepared when it comes time to win the next 16.

But damn, the thought of being healthy and earning home court is really appealing.

Can we have our cake and eat it, too? Or is it best to ignore the NBA standings link for the rest of the season ?

The following two tabs change content below.

Zach Lowe

Latest posts by Zach Lowe (see all)

Share →
  • Ben

    I looked at the research into playoff home court advantage that you listed, and I think the advantage you see is much more based on team quality than home court. The reason I say that is that the “advantage” is skewed heavily toward the earlier rounds. By the time you reach the conference finals (where the teams are of approximately the same quality) there is no advantage, as each team wins half the series regardless of which team is given the advantage. While it is true that the finals do appear to have home court advantage, it’s a small sample, and I think travel and the 2-3-2 format might be playing into that as well. It’s an interesting data set.

  • Jay P

    I just wanted to mention how perfect Doc Rivers is to coach this team. Now I’m not going to start making arguments about him being this hall of fame coach (he’s not) but I’m just saying, for this team, he’s the perfect fit. His minute management, and ability to coach what he’s given is fantastic, he’s exactly what this team needs.

    He doesn’t have to micromanage games, and with a young team that needed for basketball direction, I think he’d be awful. But I also think it’s important to mention that he’s done a great job putting his ego aside, and many times letting the Big 3 call the shots, because he knows exactly how high their basketball IQ is.

    Bottom line, I don’t think anyone out there could do the job he’s doing for this team.

  • @Jay P: Come back later today for a more Doc-centric post about offensive creativity.

  • cool hand luke

    I thought home court advantage was generally considered to be worth about 3 points per game in gambling spreads. I may be making that number up though.

  • Tom

    I don’t think anyone on this team likes losing, there is no way they will take the foot off the pedal. (Doc especially)

    Plus, who doesn’t want to see Gino at the Garden?

  • Jeff Lyons

    Good points all. I think the coaching wisdom comes into play in having some discipline about the minutes.
    Forgetting about the research involving other teams, let’s look back at the first part of the Celtics’ season last year and the consequences of overplaying the oldsters. I’m afraid if any of the starting 5 goes out for the season we don’t get past the conference finals.

  • Carlos Rizik

    Doc said it before and it seems he’s sticking to it; for them the key issue is to be healthy and rested for the playoffs, not to be the number one seed
    or to have the league’s best record.

  • JP

    Im an Orlando fan and I must admit to the same temptress that Zach Lowe mentions here. 🙂

    I think the message of this post is very real and signifcant for the Celtics this season. If they can rotate players more aggressively and still win to get homecourt then great but theres generally more risk for the Celtics to conciously “go for it” then for other teams (relatively.) If it becomes a judgment call for Doc Rivers and co, I honestly think Celtic fans should be trusting and quietly confident if they decided to avoid busting a gut to get it even though the media and general consensus will be saying the opposite.

    Regarding betting, home advantage is generally considered to be worth 3 or 3.5 pts in the context of a game. But remember, unless a series goes to 7 games, this “extra” advantage doesnt exist. A lot of the other points raised on this issue I also agree with.

    Of course there is an advantage in homecourt but its only an advantage and its considerably less worthwhile or significant to the result then the quality of the actual opposition and the various matchups that are involved.

    Im sure people who read this wont need reminding, but the Cavs last season lost only 1 meaningful home game last season to an Eastern conference team (Game 1 of the ECF) and that was it – all that momentum, hype and security blanket was gone.

  • KC

    The real key isn’t so much the home court, but the fact that the top team in the East gets to beat up on a terrible opponent in Round 1. Finish as the top seed and the C’s get a complete pushover — right now, the two best candidates for the 8-seed are Charlotte and Toronto (no offense and no defense, respectively). Finish as a 3-seed or 4-seed and you could end up against a good team like Miami or Milwaukee.

  • Pingback: Execution: Sixers 98, C’s 97 » Boston Celtics Basketball – Celtics news, rumors and analysis – CelticsHub.com()

  • You not going to believe this but I have lost all day looking for some info about this. You’re a lifesaver, it was a interesting read and really helped me out. Cheers,Homepage

  • I love reading and I am always searching for informative information like this! You are bookmarked!. . . . . .